0DATA
Factual comparison · GRC vs proof

Managing compliance is good. Proving it is verifiable.

Formalize is an excellent GRC platform: it automates workflows and compliance evidence collection (NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, SOC2). But an auditor's question is not just "do you have a tool?" — it's "can you prove it, without us taking your word for it?". That's what a GRC does not provide, and what 0DATA delivers.

Start a sealed diagnostic See the comparison

The comparison, in full transparency

A factual comparison on the criteria that matter for provable compliance — not just declared compliance.

Criterion Formalize 0DATA
CategoryGRC / compliance ops (checklist + workflows)Sealed & anchored proof
Question addressed"How do I manage my compliance?""Can I prove it?"
ProofEvidence collected in their silo (you have to trust them)SHA-256 hash on-chain, verifiable without trusting us
MechanismAI evidence-collection assistantSeals the flow + anchors every measure
FrameworksNIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, SOC2, GDPRNIS2, DORA + 18 physical verticals (CBAM, EUDR…)
Qualified timestampingNoYes — eIDAS RFC 3161 (QTSP)
Public anchoringNoYes — Hedera, verifiable without an account
ContinuitySnapshot (state at audit time)Continuous (measurement at source, 15-min cadence)
French12 languages, no dedicated FRNative FR, French company
PriceFrom ~€500/month€0.20/seal (generic) / per-vertical plans

What a checklist cannot do

Three structural gaps, from the point of view of a CIO or CISO facing an auditor.

01

Prove continuous integrity

A checklist attests to the state at a point in time T. Nothing is sealed: the document remains editable by its author, and its validity expires as soon as the system changes.

02

Provide a deliverable verifiable by a third party

Their "evidence" lives in their silo. To verify it, you have to trust them. An anchored proof is verified by recomputing the hash, with no access at all.

03

Anchor prior existence

No qualified eIDAS timestamping, no public anchoring. The date and integrity are not fixed by a trusted third party — nor independently verifiable.

The two approaches are complementary

The honest position: 0DATA is not asking you to throw away your GRC. It adds what's missing.

Complete compliance covers two sides: management (workflows, registers, policies — the job of a GRC like Formalize) and proof (sealing and anchoring the continuous measurement — the job of 0DATA). A CIO equipped with Formalize can perfectly add 0DATA's sealed & anchored proof: one organizes, the other attests. No conflict, no replacement, no migration.

Compliance is proven. Not promised.

A free sealed diagnostic shows, on your own perimeter, what continuous proof produces — a hash, a timestamp, an anchoring.

Start a sealed diagnostic